
Photo Ā© damedeeso | Deposit Photos
This week, our air quality zoomed up to Code Deep Maroon in the Washington DC area. I think they had to make up a new color because the Canadian wildfires made the air quality so bad. Weāre hundreds of miles from Canada, so itās pretty amazing that it looks like the worst days of brush fires when I was in Los Angeles.
Meanwhile, construction crews are demolishing the other side of the street. Despite all the noise, Iām finding it interesting to watch the process of what theyāre doing. They jackhammered the sidewalk. Then a bulldozer carved it all up into chunks of big rock, and a backhoe dumped it into a dump truck. Now a stream roller is flattening it out. I believe they will be adjusting the grade of the street on my side, which would be a welcome thing; when it snows, cars get stuck on the hill.
Onward to the topic:
This topic was inspired by a craft fest workshop by Kevin J. Anderson at the upcoming Superstars (they listed a schedule pretty early, so this may not be locked in). One of the challenges is that itās hard finding craft information beyond what Iāll call Beginner-Advanced.
Never settle for a lower standard.
This can come across multiple ways, and has for me. The first was submitting to non-paying magazines. It was common knowledge that you should do that to build credits, but no professional writer would have said it. That may have originated with non-paying magazines who wanted any submissions and novice writers who shared it.
This lower standard played on my subconscious: My critical voice whispered in my ear, āYouāre not good enough to get paid for your writing.ā
Thatās pretty deeply ingrained in the writing culture. Some magazines portray getting paid as if it were vulgar and you should suffer for the art. Others state they are doing you a āfavorā by listing your biography and website link, or simply by publishing you. My own family thought the only way I could ever get paid for writing was to become a Hollywood screenwriter or a journalist, neither of which I liked. Indie opened the doors, but with that standard so ingrained, writers will happily fork out several grand for developmental editing on a first book, then pay for ads when the book doesnāt sellā¦instead of working on a new book and hitting a new skill to learn.
But the other problem Iāve run intoāI discovered it reading The Fifth Discipline. Companies will set a standard, such as delivery time. For whatever reason, they canāt make the delivery metrics. Instead of identifying why, they lower their standard by expanding the time. Because they havenāt fixed the original problem, they continue to fall behind on the delivery schedule, and reduce their standards again until it becomes a crisis that they lose business.
I did this with novels. Ever since I wrote my first novel, which was still during traditional publishing days, I ran into problems with getting to the required 90K. Iād end up settling for short stories and at one point despaired that I would ever write novel-length fiction. I sought craft books to explain the problem, but by then, they were focusing on getting a new writer to finish their first novel, and baby step problems.
I didnāt realize it at the time, but I didnāt like the idea of settling for short stories. If I wrote a short story, it should be because I wanted to, not because it was second best. However, the desire to solve the problem led me to do a lot of dumb things. I wasted money on ineffective writing classes without screening them. This was how I discovered that all the fixation on plot-plot-plot that is prevalent among the beginner-advanced writers hurt my writing. On one story that ran too short, I added more and more plot, and it became a convoluted mess.
With indie, I kept circling back to novellas, since they were returning in popularity; in fact, other writers said, āWrite novellas instead.ā But it still felt like lowering my standard. Superhero Portal got to 50K (where Iām comfortable with being novel length; I donāt need 90K), but Iām still working on the skill. Iād like to land on it consistently because I wanted that book to be a novel, not because I accidentally got there. But Iām also still trying to understand the cause.
Be willing to walk away from any class
With the internet, anyone can teach writing classes, including people who have little writing experience. Sometimes itās easy to determine if a course isnāt going to be useful; a community organization offered a course on the history of Washington DC for writers, but sample chapters of the instructor’s books showed that he wasnāt good at getting it into the story. Someone else might offer a 2-hour course on writing a novel; thatās such a broad topic that itās probably only for someone thinking of starting their first novel.
Othersā¦not so obvious. The higher the price and the longer the course, the more information is needed. I signed up briefly for a community that had writing courses and came recommended by someone. Their material said it would include advanced courses and master classes. So I thought Iād give it a try. Once I got inside and saw what was offered, I determined that their definition of advanced was not the same as mine. With only basic material available, anything above it looks advanced. It was what Iād call beginner-advanced (they were calling it mid-level, so you can see how confusing the definitions can become). I asked for a refund and walked away.
But Iāve also not always done that. One time, I signed up for a class on the old Forward Motion site. The class was called āPantser-Friendly Outlining.ā From the sound of it, I figured it might help me solve the problems of getting to a novel-length so I signed up (this was at a point where I was firefighting writing skills, which was not a good practice).
The class was four weeks and had about twenty writers who all gleefully declared, āThis is fun!ā and āThis is easy.ā I stared at the instructions and tried to force-fit how I wrote into them. It was very painful; it felt like fingernails on a chalkboard. The instructor was immediately frustrated with me because I wasnāt comprehending what she thought was something easy.
I nearly quit after that first painful session. But I felt like Iād already signed up for the class; I needed to take all the lessons. So I went back for all three weeks, and history repeated itself. The other writers, still amazed I wasnāt comprehending something so easy, explained it to me like I was stupid. Fingernails on a chalkboard all the way through. A few weeks after, I looked at what I created with those lessons, and I didnāt understand how I did anything in the class at all!
When I first found Dean Wesley Smithās classesāand for pantsers!āI was about to take yet another course (I think it was Beginner-Basic on description). I looked at the first lesson, decided it wasnāt worth my time, and walked away. I do feel a little guilty about spending the money; if itās over $50, I think a long time before considering taking it. If itās $20, Iāll grab it and hope for the best (as I write this, I just purchased a lecture packet from Margie Lawson on endings. Though the packets focus on revision, they scratch my intellection itch with power words and rhetorical devices).
I also discovered that as high input, I will collect classes; intellection will take them when it feels the need; and Learner (#6) will also take as much as it needs to learn. I was feeling guilty because I wasnāt always finishing Dean Wesley Smithās workshops (in many cases, repeat information; in others, he went off the topic I wanted to learn).
If the class is not working, or itās repetitive, you can stop. Thereās no point in fingernails on the chalkboard.
Finallyā¦
Stand up for your writing process
This has been one of the hardest things for me to learn. Everyoneās writing process is unique to them. There will be some things that work well for them, and other things that donāt work at all.
But itās treated as a one size fits all (which means āwithout modificationā), both on the outlining side and on the pantsing side.
I was on message boards for many years, and enjoyed it then later hated it. The writers pressured me and other pantsers to outline. At one point, I succumbed, figuring everyone else must know better and not trusting my writing process. I felt very frustrated by it at the time and thought it was like throwing paint at the wall. That was how I landed in the āPantser-Friendly Outliningā class and tried The Marshall Plan for Novel Writing.
Iāve also been lectured by pantsers because my writing process didnāt exactly fit that dogma. In that case, I changed my process for two reasons:
1. I kept getting stuck and doing redrafts of scenes. For the beginning of the story, it was often multiple redrafts of the same few scenes. It was frustrating because I felt like something was missing and I didnāt know what it was. The dogma was to ātrust your subconsciousā and āwrite the next word.ā The second part of that advice resulted in the redrafts (it was apparent this was a direct cause once I changed my process a little). The change? Using Plottr to type out ideas about where the scene might go, regardless of if I used any. I was lectured because I āwasnāt trusting my subconscious.ā
2. I donāt always think of things in order. Details are sometimes hard for me to get into the story on the first typing and have to evolve; also, when they get added may depend on another scene six chapters in. Cycling is a great tool for this but also carries a surprising amount of opinion about whatās ārightā attached to it. In Superhero Vs. Superhero, I got to an action scene and only then did I know what setting details I needed in the first chapter. I had to make multiple cycling passes through the first chapter, layering in the details as they evolved in the later chapter. Then I repeated it for another action scene that followed because my creative side said, āWouldnāt it be cool ifā¦?ā Everything affects all the scenes in between, so I was doing many passes as my brain pinballed around. The dogma? That cycling is only the last 400 words. I thought Iād gotten away from āThis Is The Only Way To Do Thisā when I left the message boards.
This time, as opposed to when I was on the message boards, I didnāt question what I was doing. My creative side was singing with joy because it was having so much fun being in control of where it wanted to go in the story, not because of a random writing rule.
But itās hard. When you are lectured by someone, itās easy to start second-guessing yourself. So itās important to not only stand up for your writing process, but also to not get in the way of yourself when it needs adjustments.
Okay, those are the things I wished I knew about writing. What are yours?
totally agreed! I have never liked writing short stories, and there is no “right” writing process. Some take more time in different areas, some are more chaotic in certain respects, but what works for YOU as a writer is the right process. Period. Every approach has benefits and tradeoffs. Personally, I write first drafts as a pantser. It makes for some intense revision moments, but those moments when I suddenly realize where it is my characters are leading me are just magical.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi, Vic. Yes, people tend not to understand that what works fantastically for them may be terrible for someone else.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Earlier this morning, I read an article (well, technically, a transcript of an interview) wherein someone was still pushing the “write for credits, then semi-pro pay, then pro pay” line. Or, well, that’s how it came across to me, even though they were also talking about making money indie publishing. Confused? Yeah, so was I. *grin*
Also, the only thing of use that I got from the Marshall plan was his chart on number of POV characters vs. number of words (or, in his plan, scenes, IIRC). And then it wasn’t so much his actual numbers as it was the realization that more POV characters generally equaled more words/scenes. Simple? Maybe, but somehow I’d completely missed that.
I wish I’d known how to trust myself better – my own creative subconscious and the Story that wants to be told through me – and not to listen to people who gaslighted me when it came to my process. For me, outlining equals writing the story, and I have no desire to go back and write the *same freaking story* a second time. “Oh, you’ll enjoy it, because it’s easier with an outline!” That’s a hard no, yo.
I wish I’d known how to define success for myself – even as a beginner – and not get caught up in how many words per day or stories per year or any other metric du jour.
And I should stop there, or else this will become one long diatribe.
Thanks for another thought-provoking post!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi, Peggy, check out my link in my next post. Theres’ a book I pick up this week for writers who don’t write “right.” The author had two writers tell her how she saw the story was completely wrong. It’s a miracle people actually stay in writing with all the bad advice out there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My stories usually pick their own length though sometimes i have to cut or add something to reach a goal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d like mine to get to that point. š
LikeLiked by 1 person