Last week, Tamora Pierce’s new book Tempests and Slaughter came out. Long-awaited for me. I love reading her books.
But animals also die in her books.
I don’t mind that because she portrays them as characters. They carry the same weight as human characters. If we mourn the loss of a human character, we mourn the loss of an animal character.
Are others offended that animals die in her books?
I’ve had problems with thrillers. If a cat or dog makes an appearance in one of those, I’m done. I stop reading. Most the writers of those books kill the animal to show how evil the kill is. In one book, I was pretty sure the writer was fictionally killing off the cat his wife had forced him to have.
Do other people read through those books and enjoy them?
It’s part of writing stories that we have to push at our boundaries.
And sometimes make people uncomfortable.
Star Trek also did that.
It’s one of the reasons the show has endured despite 50 years. No one apologized. They simply did.
But as I was driving into work this morning, I heard a story about the new Peter Rabbit movie. Seemed that a scene offended people so the movie company apologized.
I haven’t seen the film, but the scene sounded like teenage bullying…with rabbits. So we can’t use movies to bring up bullying? Or that it should only be in a certain way? That the readers aren’t capable of figuring things out for themselves?
Sometimes books and movies are a safe place to push at a boundary. Star Trek was great because it was set in the future and could be escapist at the same time. But now, somehow, it’s become the thing not to offend.
Yeah, there are people like artists who do something for the shock value. Then there are those who bring their experiences to the story and show us a different perspective. They make us think.
Problem is that people can be offended by pretty much anything.
So we rob our society of the ability to do social commentary of differing viewpoints. We end up with the watered down “committee” stories because people are afraid a reader will call offense.
Star Trek is still relevant today. Yet, Chris Pine, the “new” Captain Kirk says we couldn’t make show like that today.
Think about that. Think about that a long time.
Bravo. In our bizarro world, those “artists” who do things specifically for shock value are also often applauded (loudly) by the same segment of our society who generally makes a point of being offended by anything done or said innocently. Go figure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought a “hook” was shock value and tried it on my first novel…a very long time ago. It gets people’s attention briefly, they might talk about it briefly, but that’s all their stay is–brief.
I have killed animals in some of my stories–not often–and I would never do it for shock value.
It’s such a problem in thrillers that veterinarian James Rollins had a dog in one of his books that came out okay, but all the readers were horrified, thinking he was going to kill it.
It is a sad state of things, that’s for sure.
And yes, Star Trek was so innovative and daring in it’s day and they’d get shut down for sure nowadays. 😢
LikeLiked by 1 person
I also just heard about a reviewer who was told to dump her existing review and change it because of public outcry. Just crazy.
Comments are closed.