Our weather finally dived into the deep end to prepare for winter. That’s now only a few weeks off and hard to believe. The leaves never changed colors. Some simply dried out and fell off.
On “Write Like a Pulp Writer,” I’m digging into the time management lesson learned. That’s becoming a fairly big topic because no one quite talks about it. If you’re reading a standard time management book, they talk about your work career and accomplishing those goals. Your personal life is this thing on the side that’s there and has nothing to do with the goals (along with sleep).
The writing ones talk about squeezing time in around the day job. Neither talk about how these are going to impact each other, or what you can do to offset that. That might be a book on its own.
And here’s a realization for you about revision:
New technology offers the promise of making less work for us. Which is a lie. It makes more work. When I was in the Army, we printed PowerPoint slides and copied them onto transparencies. That was the technology available. If the presenter had a change to one of the slides, he simply corrected it verbally at the meeting.
Enter technology to show presentations with a computer. Now people revise their slides twenty or thirty times, tweak one more word five minutes before the meeting.
The computer makes writing easy. No doubt about it. Perfect tool to cycle while working on the first draft. But it also makes it easy to do what I see people do with PowerPoint. Revise, revise, revise…because you can. They don’t think that the ease of the tool is making them do more work.
Something to think about: What if you could only do one draft?
I suspect some people would hear, “one draft” and fall into endless pondering to make it “perfect” without writing more than a sentence or two at a time. If that.
But here’s the thing: perfection is also a lie.
There’s no such thing. Ever. (Though many Christians do believe Jesus was perfect. Whether that’s true or not is beyond me, but it’s also not really relevant, as none of us are Jesus, however much we might try to be like Him. We’re human, fully and gloriously so, including all of our imperfections.)
All that said, I struggle with “getting it right” a lot. I have one short story that my beta reader said needed a bit of work with the ending to really feel that it was done. Do I go back and revise the ending, knowing that while I can’t make it perfect, I can maybe make it better? Or do I move on to the next story?
Decisions, decisions.
LikeLike
Hi, Peggy
I get what your reader is looking for. It’s a problem unique to pantsers because we cycle. The ending often doesn’t get as much cycling love as the rest of the book because it’s the last thing we right. Or like me, you might be in a rush to get the book done.
What you’re looking for here is not a revision, but a cycling pass, Most likely, you might add a few sentences to pull everything together.
LikeLike
Oh! *light bulb*
That makes *so* much sense! Thank you!!
LikeLike